Compare Food Storage Containers
Weck 743 Mold Jar Transparent Glass Food Storage Containers with Airtight Lids (3/4 Liter Tall Jars, Set of 4) scores higher on safety - here's why.
R3 scored the Weck 743 Mold Jar Transparent Glass Food Storage Containers with Airtight Lids (3/4 Liter Tall Jars, Set of 4) 9.7/10 and the Glad GladWare Entree Food Storage Containers (25 oz, 5 Count - 2 Pack) 6.6/10 on the same food storage containers scoring system, weighing safety, efficacy, and usability. The Weck 743 Mold Jar Transparent Glass Food Storage Containers with Airtight Lids (3/4 Liter Tall Jars, Set of 4) comes out ahead, led by its safety score (9.7/10 vs 6.7/10).
The most important dimensions, side by side.
Unlock the full Weck 743 Mold Jar Transparent Glass Food Storage Containers with Airtight Lids (3/4 Liter Tall Jars, Set of 4) vs Glad GladWare Entree Food Storage Containers (25 oz, 5 Count - 2 Pack) breakdown
Free account unlocks all safety scores, complete spec comparison, scoring rationale, and the R3 verdict on which one to buy.
See which one actually scores higher — and why
Free account unlocks full safety scores, spec-by-spec breakdown, and the R3 verdict on Weck 743 Mold Jar Transparent Glass Food Storage Containers with Airtight Lids (3/4 Liter Tall Jars, Set of 4) vs Glad GladWare Entree Food Storage Containers (25 oz, 5 Count - 2 Pack).
Safety Context
Here's what our analysis flagged on the safety front - not to alarm you, but because this is exactly the kind of detail that's hard to find in a spec sheet.
Weck
Active Prop 65 warning
California requires this disclosure when a product contains substances on its list - it doesn't mean it's unsafe, but it's worth factoring in for families with young children.
Glad
No active safety flags in our analysis.
Safety flags affect scores - safety is the highest-weighted pillar in our scoring system. If a product has an active Prop 65 warning, that's reflected in its safety pillar rating above. The comparison above shows exactly where the gap lives.
Everything you need to make the call - who each one is for, and who should skip it.
Go for it if you...
Safety is your top priority - this product scores highest on material safety.
You want the best value for money in this category.
Performance is what matters most to you.
You need affordable, disposable-friendly containers for daily meal prep and packed lunches
You want the easiest possible daily use with one-handed snap lids and dishwasher-safe everything
You go through containers frequently and need replaceable sets at under two dollars per container
You are okay with plastic food contact and prioritize convenience and budget over material safety
The main thing to know
Independent testing found lead in the exterior glass glaze (142-159 ppm) — this is on the outside of the jar, not on food-contact surfaces, but it triggers a California Prop 65 warning that families with young children should be aware of.
These are polypropylene plastic containers. While FDA-approved and BPA-free, plastic inherently scores lower than glass or stainless steel for food-contact safety in our methodology. If material safety is your top priority, look at glass alternatives.
Skip this if you...
You need quick one-handed access for busy meal prep — the two-clamp lid system requires both hands and more steps than snap-on alternatives.
You want fully dishwasher-safe containers — the glass jars go in, but the rubber gaskets and stainless steel clamps must be hand-washed.
You have very young children who handle food containers independently — the exterior glaze contains lead at levels that trigger a Prop 65 warning.
You want to avoid plastic food contact entirely and prefer glass or stainless steel
You need oven-safe containers for reheating or baking
You want the highest material safety scores and are willing to pay more for glass containers
Neither of these quite what you're looking for?
I've reviewed all Food Storage Containers options at every price pointEvery Food Storage Containers in our database is scored using R3's deterministic scoring system - the same inputs always produce the same score. For this comparison, we evaluated Weck and Glad across 3 independent criteria: Safety (94%), Efficacy (6%), Usability (1%). No sponsored rankings. No paid placements.
Straight answers - no sponsored content, no filler.
I'd start with Weck Weck 743 Mold Jar Transparent Glass Food Storage Containers with Airtight Lids (3/4 Liter Tall Jars, Set of 4) - it scored 9.7/10 overall in our scoring system. Safety is our top-weighted scoring pillar, followed by efficacy, and usability. Check which pillar matters most to your family and compare those specific scores.
R3 uses a deterministic scoring system - the same inputs always produce the same score. We evaluate each Food Storage Containers across Safety, Efficacy, Usability using independently verified data. No sponsored rankings. No paid placements. Every score is fully reproducible.
Not necessarily. The overall score reflects how we weight those three pillars, but your priorities may differ. If you care most about safety, compare the safety scores directly. If budget drives your decision, the prices tell a clearer story. The "right" pick is the one that matches what matters most to your family.
Not the right match? Explore these alternatives in the same category.

Weck
Weck 743 Mold Jar Transparent Glass Food Storage Containers with Airtight Lids (3/4 Liter Tall Jars, Set of 4)
9.7

Ziploc
Ziploc Food Storage Meal Prep Containers with SmartSnap Technology (Deep Square, 3-Pack)
6.6

Caraway
Caraway 14-Piece Glass Food Storage Container Set
9.7

Snapware
Snapware Total Solution 6-Cup Rectangle Glass Food Storage Container
6.9