Compare Cordless Vacuum
Which scores higher on safety? R3 breaks it down.
R3 scored the Dyson Gen5detect Cordless Vacuum 7.6/10 and the Samsung Bespoke Jet Complete Extra Cordless Vacuum 7.7/10 on the same cordless vacuum scoring system, weighing safety, efficacy, and usability. The overall scores are close; the pillar breakdown below shows where they differ.
The most important dimensions, side by side.
See which one actually scores higher — and why
Free account unlocks full safety scores, spec-by-spec breakdown, and the R3 verdict on Dyson Gen5detect Cordless Vacuum vs Samsung Bespoke Jet Complete Extra Cordless Vacuum.
Unlock the full Dyson Gen5detect Cordless Vacuum vs Samsung Bespoke Jet Complete Extra Cordless Vacuum breakdown
Free account unlocks all safety scores, complete spec comparison, scoring rationale, and the R3 verdict on which one to buy.
Everything you need to make the call - who each one is for, and who should skip it.
Go for it if you...
You have VOC concerns — new construction off-gassing, heavy cleaning product use, or chemical sensitivities — and want activated carbon filtration alongside sealed HEPA 14 particle capture.
Your home is 2,000+ sq ft and 50 minutes of runtime (vs 40 minutes in the V15) means the difference between finishing in one charge or needing a mid-session recharge.
You want Dyson's highest-spec cordless vacuum and the price difference is not a primary consideration in your purchase.
You want the auto-emptying Clean Station dock — it automatically empties the bin into a sealed bag on docking, eliminating the most common moment of allergen re-exposure during vacuuming.
Your home is large enough that 60-minute runtime (the category maximum) and the lightest cordless weight (6.2lbs) both matter to your cleaning routine.
You want the highest published filtration capture rate in the category (99.999%) combined with the only automatic bin-sealing system that maintains that capture integrity through disposal.
The main thing to know
The Gen5detect scores 7.60 — virtually identical to the $380 V15 Detect (7.61). The $670 premium is real; what you get for it is 10 more minutes of runtime, 32Pa more suction (both already at ceiling), an activated carbon layer for VOC capture, and Dyson's most advanced brush bar. If none of those features address your specific needs, the V15 Detect delivers the same core safety profile at a fraction of the cost.
The Samsung Bespoke Jet Complete Extra is the category's daily-use champion: best runtime (60 min), lightest weight (6.2lbs), and the only vacuum with an auto-emptying dock. For families who vacuum large spaces frequently and want the Clean Station to handle bin disposal automatically, the premium is justified. For families who primarily need allergen-safe filtration, the $380 Dyson V15 Detect delivers the same core safety profile at less than a third of the price.
Skip this if you...
You're comparing this to the V15 Detect — the core safety profile (sealed HEPA 14, UL battery) is identical, and the V15 saves $670 for a lighter, lower-TCO unit.
You want a user-replaceable battery: the Miele Triflex HX2 offers field-swappable battery packs at $849 and earns the highest safety score in the category (8.24).
Weight matters for your use case — 7.3lbs is the heaviest in the Dyson lineup and the category, and the ergonomic difference from the V15's 6.8lbs is noticeable over extended cleaning sessions.
Your primary concern is safety-to-price value — the Dyson V15 Detect delivers the same sealed HEPA filtration and UL-certified battery at $380 vs $1,099.
Noise matters to your household — 72dB is category average and louder than the Miele (66dB) or Shark (68dB); you're not getting class-leading quiet at this price.
You want a user-replaceable battery for long-term ownership — the Miele Triflex HX2 ($849) offers TÜV-certified swappable batteries and the highest safety credentials in the category.
Neither of these quite what you're looking for?
I've reviewed all Cordless Vacuum options at every price pointEvery Cordless Vacuum in our database is scored using R3's deterministic scoring system - the same inputs always produce the same score. For this comparison, we evaluated Dyson and Samsung across 3 independent criteria: Safety (80%), Efficacy (13%), Usability (7%). No sponsored rankings. No paid placements.
Straight answers - no sponsored content, no filler.
Both scored close to 7.6/10, so the better choice depends on your priorities. Safety is our top-weighted scoring pillar, followed by efficacy, and usability. Check which pillar matters most to your family and compare those specific scores.
R3 uses a deterministic scoring system - the same inputs always produce the same score. We evaluate each Cordless Vacuum across Safety, Efficacy, Usability using independently verified data. No sponsored rankings. No paid placements. Every score is fully reproducible.
Not necessarily. The overall score reflects how we weight those three pillars, but your priorities may differ. If you care most about safety, compare the safety scores directly. If budget drives your decision, the prices tell a clearer story. The "right" pick is the one that matches what matters most to your family.
Not the right match? Explore these alternatives in the same category.
