Caraway vs OXO
Caraway
$145AmazonOXO
$68Amazon7-day free trial · Cancel anytime
Two strong Food Storage Container options for different priorities
These products scored within 0.3 points of each other in our V4.2 rubric - essentially a tie. Caraway (7.2/10, $145) vs OXO (7.5/10, $68). The best pick depends on which pillar matters most to you: safety (50% weight), performance (20%), usability (20%), or value (10%).
Caraway wins on:
Caraway 14-Piece Glass Food Storage Container Set
$145
OXO Good Grips 16 Piece Smart Seal Leakproof Airtight Glass Food Storage Container Set
$68
Feature-by-feature breakdown across 2 products
Caraway
Strengths
OXO
Strengths
Weaknesses
Feature Comparison
Caraway
8.4
OXO
6.5
Why it matters: Safety carries 50% of the overall score in our V4.2 rubric. We evaluate materials, certifications, and compliance across multiple criteria. Caraway scored 8.4/10 vs OXO's 6.5/10.
Caraway
Strengths
Weaknesses
OXO
Strengths
Feature Comparison
Caraway
6.1
OXO
9.3
Why it matters: Our efficacy pillar (20% weight) measures real-world performance - how well the product delivers on its core function. Caraway scored 6.1/10 vs OXO's 9.3/10.
Caraway
7.2
OXO
7.5
Why it matters: Weighted average of all scoring dimensions.
Caraway
Strengths
Weaknesses
OXO
Strengths
Feature Comparison
Caraway
6.1
OXO
7.8
Why it matters: Usability (20% weight) covers daily convenience - ease of use, maintenance, and practical considerations. Caraway scored 6.1/10 vs OXO's 7.8/10.
Caraway
Strengths
Weaknesses
OXO
Strengths
Feature Comparison
Caraway
$145
OXO
$68
Why it matters: Lower price is better when quality is comparable.
Caraway
6.0
OXO
8.0
Why it matters: Value (10% weight) calculates quality per dollar. Caraway: $20/point vs OXO: $9/point. Lower cost-per-point means better value.
Caraway has a higher safety rating of 8.4/10.
OXO offers better value for money with a score of 8.0/10.
OXO has a higher performance rating of 9.3/10.
OXO scores higher on usability with 7.8/10 for cleaning, controls, and daily convenience.
All products are excellent choices. Consider which specific features matter most to your family.
Already have an account? Log in
Both scored close to 7.2/10, so the better choice depends on your priorities. Safety carries 50% of our scoring weight, followed by performance (20%), usability (20%), and value (10%). Check which pillar matters most to your family and compare those specific scores.
We use our V4.2 deterministic rubric with four weighted pillars: Safety (50%), Efficacy (20%), Usability (20%), and Value (10%). Every score is reproducible - the same product data produces the same score. Each product is evaluated across multiple criteria within each pillar.
Not necessarily. The overall score reflects our weighted rubric, but your priorities may differ. If you care most about safety, compare the safety scores directly. If budget drives your decision, the value scores and prices tell a clearer story. The "right" pick is the one that matches what matters most to your family.